WASHINGTON >> The destiny of 800,000 younger immigrants hung within the stability Thursday as prime lawmakers, White Home officers and President Donald Trump himself squabbled over whether or not an settlement had been struck to guard them — and in that case, precisely what it was.
Within the face of an intense backlash from conservatives contained in the Capitol and out, Speaker Paul Ryan and different GOP Home members adamantly insisted that there was no settlement to enshrine protections for the immigrants delivered to America as youngsters and now right here illegally.
John Cornyn of Texas, the No. 2 Senate Republican, put it this manner: There was “a deal to make a deal.”
Trump himself stated he was “pretty shut” to an settlement that would shield the younger “Dreamers” whereas additionally including border safety, so long as his lengthy-promised wall with Mexico was additionally individually addressed. Democratic leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer — whose dinner with Trump on Wednesday night time was on the coronary heart of the controversy — insisted there was dialogue and even settlement on laws that may supply eventual citizenship to the immigrants in query.
“We agreed it might be the DREAM Act,” Schumer advised reporters, referring to a bipartisan invoice that might permit immigrants introduced right here as youngsters and now within the U.S. illegally to work their solution to citizenship in as little as 5 years in the event that they meet sure necessities.
However one individual conversant in the assembly stated the president had agreed to not the DREAM Act, however to narrower laws that might make everlasting the protections provided by President Barack Obama’s Deferred Motion for Childhood Arrivals program.
What was clear was that the result for the “Dreamers” themselves was nonetheless unresolved and topic to a lot additional debate and negotiation — and that the politics of immigration, which has defeated Congress for years, remained as tough and explosive as ever. After profitable the White Home on a marketing campaign that was remarkably harsh towards immigrants and revolved round development of an unlimited wall alongside all the border with Mexico, Trump’s sudden pivot infuriated a few of his closest allies, and appeared to include extra potential to alienate his base than any of his different unconventional strikes.
“He was so specific in the course of the marketing campaign on the difficulty of the border wall and border safety that if he have been to backtrack on that promise, I…